Monday, February 28, 2011

Journal Eight: Compare and Contrast

For this journal assignment, please take a look at the comparison below made between Nabisco's Sugar Wafer and Fig Newton by Paul Goldberger, the architectural critic for the New York Times:





SUGAR WAFER (NABISCO) There is no attempt to imitate the ancient forms of traditional, individually
baked cookies here—this is a modern cookie through and through. Its simple rectangular form, clean and pure, just reeks of mass production and modern technological methods. The two wafers, held together by the sugar-cream filling, appear to float . . . this is a machine-age object.

FIG NEWTON (NABISCO) This, too, is a sandwich but different in every way from the Sugar Wafer. Here the imagery is more traditional, more sensual even; a rounded form of cookie dough arcs over the fig concoction inside, and the whole is soft and pliable. Like all good pieces of design, it has an appropriate form for its use, since the insides of Fig Newtons can ooze and would not be held in place by a more rigid form. The thing could have had a somewhat different shape, but the rounded tip is a comfortable, familiar image, and it’s easy to hold. Not a revolutionary object but an intelligent one.


Here, Goldberger focuses on the "architectural design" of the cookies for his compare/contrast exercise. I want you to do something similar. Find two objects that are equally interchangeable and write 200-300 words comparing and contrasting them using "design" as the only criteria for your evaluation. You might look at cell phones, the covers of two CDs from the same artist, toothbrushes. Have fun picking your objects. The only rule: KEEP IT SIMPLE!

Please include photos of the objects you are evaluating in your blog. When you are composing your new post, you'll see an image next to "Link" in the toolbar above your post. Click on this image and then you'll receive instructions for how to paste images into your post. It's quite easy.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Assignment #3: Critical Review (Evaluation)


Purpose
Evaluate an object or phenomenon that interests you and merits your attention. Write to a specific audience, one who can act upon or respond to your evaluation, and write with a specific purpose in mind.

Invention
Keep the following in mind as you brainstorm/draft:
Ø  Choose a specific object/phenomenon to evaluate, and explain why it merits evaluation..
Ø  Identify the category in which you are placing your subject, and develop evaluative criteria for that category. For example, if you are going to evaluate The Office, you would determine whether or not you want to categorize it as a mockumentary, an American or British comedy, an Emmy-award winning show, intelligent comedy, etc.
Ø  Once you know the subject and category for this paper, brainstorm a long list of evaluative criteria that could be applied to your subject/category and then determine which criteria are most important for your subject/purpose, keeping your specific audience in mind.
Ø  Develop an argument that either explicitly states whyyour subject meets the evaluative criteria for the category you have chosen or specify why the subject needs to be re-categorized.
Ø  Consider your purpose and intended audience--is your evaluation of your subject  informative, entertaining, and/or persuasive?
Ø  Revisit your exigence for your paper. How does your subject of evaluation correspond to your exigence?

Expectations
A successful critical review will:
1.     Have an introduction that explains why the subject merits evaluation;
2.     Place the topic in a precise category;
3.     Develop evaluative criteria by which you will make your key judgments, negative and/or positive (these criteria should be agreeable to your audience, or you should make the case as to why they are valid criteria);
4.     Use concrete evidence and examples that illustrate the ways in which the subject/phenomenon does or does not meet each evaluative criterion; and
5.     Compare and contrast your subject with others in the same category in order to help the reader understand your claims.

Length: 3-4 pages (double-spaced)
Rough Draft Due: March 14, 2011
Final Assignment Portfolio Due: March 18, 2010
Resources: “What Makes it an Evaluation” on page 302 and “Checking Over an Evaluation” on page 307 of The Harbrace Guide to Writing.

Critical Evaluation Proposal Guidelines


-        At least 1 page, typed, 12-pt font, MLA header
-        What do you want to review?
-        How will you establish merit?
-        What category does it fall into?
-        What might you compare or contrast your object with?
-        Who is your audience?
-        Name at least three pieces of criteria you will use in your evaluation

Due: Monday, February 28, 2011

Questions for Critical Evaluation Presentations

-        What is the purpose of the review (ie: consider timeliness, audience, exigence, etc)?
-        Is the merit for the review established? If so, what is it?
-        Who is the audience for this review? How can you tell?
-        How does the author evaluate this particular subject? That is: how is the piece structured? Does he/she use compare and contrast? Narrative techniques? Descriptive examples? Close reading/critical analysis?)
-        Point out the kinds of descriptive adjectives and phrases the author uses that help to convey his/her opinion, in addition to the more outright value statements. How do these benefit the piece? Do they hurt or help the ethos of the piece?
-        What criteria is this author using to evalute his/her subject? How can you tell?
-        Do you agree with the review? Why or why not? What was convincing/unconvincing about the review?

Evaluation Readings for Presentations

Read one of the following according to the presentation group you were assigned in class. On Friday, I'll be handing out a series of questions related to the readings that you will answer as a group. You'll then present your findings to the class.

- Lauren Conrad: 
http://www.salon.com/books/review/2009/06/19/lauren_conrad/
 
- Social Network: 
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2010/10/04/101004crat_atlarge_denby
 
 
- James Ellroy: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/books/review/Jacobs-t.html?_r=1&ref=bookreviews

 
- Ruth Reichl:
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/29/arts/restaurants-065093.html

 

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Journal Seven: Establishing Merit and Criteria For Evaluations

For this journal assignment, I want you to pick something to evaluate. It can be anything you like: a product, a movie, a book, etc. etc. It does not have to be something you will use in your final evaluation paper, but it could be. After you've decided on the thing that you want to evaluate, I want you to do the follow in 500 words:

1. Tell me what you are evaluating and why it merits evaluation (Is it popular? New? Revolutionary? Controversial?).
2.  Define what category this thing is in. Is it a horror film? A romance novel? Is it indie rock? Or is it pop music? Is it functional or is its aesthetically valuable? What other items could you compare it to?
3.  List THE CRITERIA you will use to evaluate your subject. You need to have at least FIVE pieces of criteria that you will use to establish the value of your subject.

If you have read Chapter 9 in Harbrace, all this should be a cinch!

Monday, February 7, 2011

Even More Extra Credit

Elizabeth Kadetsky, an incredible writer as well as a Creative Writing professor here at Penn State, will be giving a talk on Tuesday, February 22 at 4 pm in 124 Sparks. Her talk is titled "Memoir, Fiction and the Romance of the Real." I highly encourage all of you to attend this talk, which is being given in conjunction with the Family Writing Contest (see below). If you do -- and write a 500 word response -- you'll receive credit worth one journal assignment.

 

More Extra Credit

1. "Family Writing Contest"

The contest is part of the 2011 Centre County Reads/CALS Community Read of Jeannette Walls' "true life" novel Half Broke Horses.

Walls is also the best selling author of The Glass Castle, a memoir about growing up in a nomadic family with an artistic mother and alcoholic father.

Enter your best writing on a "family"-related theme in the categories of:
- Best Short Nonfiction
- Best Short Fiction
- Best Parody
- Best Entry for a Writer Under 18

$200 Grand Prize and additional prizes for winners in each category

Entries due February 15


Send your entry to familywrite@gmail.com -- Be sure to include a cover letter with your name, address, contact information, and a brief biography.

If your memoir meets the criteria of "family-themed" then, by all means, enter your story! If not, feel free to write a new piece. Either way, forward me the email you send to familywrite@gmail.com and you'll receive credit equal to one journal entry.

2. "Democracy and Literature: An Open Question"
When: February 17 & 18, 2011
Where: Foster Auditorium at Pattee and Paterno Library

Schedule:

Thursday, February 17, 3-5 pm
Opening Forum on democracy and literature, followed by a discussion

Friday, February 18, 10 am-12 pm
Panel One: Literature and the State

Friday, February 18, 1-3 pm
Panel Two: Literacy and Popular Culture

If you attend one of these talks, simply write a 500 word reflection, post it on your blog, and you'll receive credit for one journal entry.

3. The Mary E. Rolling Reading Series Presents...


Who: Terrance Hayes
Bio: Terrance Hayes most recent poetry collection is the National Book Award-winning Lighthead (Penguin 2010). His other books are Wind in a Box, Muscular Music, and Hip Logic. His honors include four Best American Poetry selections, a Whiting Writers Award, a National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship and a Guggenheim Fellowship. He is a professor of creative writing at Carnegie Mellon University and lives in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 
When: Thursday, February 10, 7:30 pm
Where: Foster Auditorium at Pattee and Paterno Library


Also...


Who: Aimee Bender
Bio: Aimee Bender is the author of four books: The Girl in the Flammable Skirt (1998) which was a NY Times Notable Book, An Invisible Sign of My Own (2000) which was an L.A. Times pick of the year, Willful Creatures (2005) which was nominated by The Believer as one of the best books of the year, and The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake (2010) which recently won the SCIBA award for best fiction. 
Her short fiction has been published in Granta,GQ, Harper's, Tin House, McSweeney's, The Paris Review, and many more places, as well as heard on PRI's This American Life and Selected Shorts. She received two Pushcart prizes, and was nominated for the TipTree award in 2005, and the Shirley Jackson short story award in 2010. Her fiction has been translated into sixteen languages. She lives in Los Angeles, where she teaches creative writing at USC.When: Wednesday, February 23, 7:30 pm
Where: Foster Auditorium at Pattee and Paterno Library


If you attend a reading, write a 500-word reflection and post it to your blog in order to receive credit for one journal entry.